Behavioral data

For most of the tasks we collect participants’ responses, in order to asses their engagement and performance. We calculate the accuracy of the subjects’ responses and we present a brief description of what this accuracy represents.

MTTWE behavioral data

If the Cue presented in the given trial hinted at time judgment, participants were to judge whether the previous Event occurred before the Reference, by pressing the button of the left hand, or after the Reference, by pressing the button of the right hand. If the Cue concerned with space judgment, the participants were to judge, in the same way, whether the Event occurred west or east of the Reference. These scores were estimated considering the answers provided during the Event+Response conditions.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the MTTWE task

Run	sub-01	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1	81	83	76	71	57	82	42	76	57	70	n/a
2	81	92	78	83	60	90	51	76	58	78	95
3	91	100	68	80	63	86	55	77	63	76	98
Mean	85	92	75	78	60	86	50	77	60	75	97

MTTNS behavioral data

If the Cue presented in the given trial hinted at time judgment, participants were to judge whether the previous Event occurred before the Reference, by pressing the button of the left hand, or after the Reference, by pressing the button of the right hand. If the Cue concerned with space judgment, the participants were to judge, in the same way, whether the Event occurred north or south of the Reference. These scores were estimated considering the answers provided during the Event+Response conditions. Chance level was set at 50%. Note: Low scores for sub-15 relate to loss of behavioral data during acquisition time in MTTWE and MTTNS tasks.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the MTTNS task

Run	sub-01	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14
1	86	93	76	73	62	83	65	71	65	73
2	88	96	80	73	72	92	67	76	53	68
3	91	100	56	82	68	87	70	70	57	72
Mean	89	97	71	77	68	88	68	72	59	72

TheoryOfMind behavioral data

Participants were to judge whether a statement about the story previously displayed is true or false by pressing respectively with the index or middle finger. The chance level was 50%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the TheoryOfMind task

Run	sub-01	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1	90	90	70	70	80	n/a	90	70	90	80	90
2	80	80	80	90	60	50	70	80	70	70	70
Mean	85	85	75	80	70	50	80	75	80	75	80

VSTM behavioral data

Participants were to remember the orientation of the bars from the previous sample and answer with one of the two possible button presses depending on whether one of the bars in the current display had changed orientation by 90◦ or not, which was the case in half of the trials. For each level of numerosity, scores in every run are related to the trials referring to visual stimuli matching the specified numerosity. The chance level was 50%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the VSTM task

Numerosity	Run	sub-01	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
All numerosities	1	36	51	28	53	44	49	58	35	29	33	40
	2	49	49	12	57	36	56	50	40	35	18	38
	3	40	49	42	58	46	44	56	49	42	39	42
	4	43	58	39	57	39	56	57	47	43	43	44
	Mean	42	52	30	56	41	51	55	43	37	33	41
1	1	33	57	38	56	45	78	77	38	36	54	60
	2	60	59	6	60	31	60	64	55	31	18	56
	3	43	62	36	64	58	29	83	44	62	33	25
	4	70	73	54	60	50	71	58	88	62	42	50
	Mean	52	63	34	60	46	60	70	56	48	37	48
2	1	50	82	54	54	80	58	59	36	38	43	31
	2	58	38	18	55	29	75	57	40	27	40	27
	3	27	50	58	73	67	41	58	54	31	38	20
	4	31	83	17	77	58	43	67	55	45	45	56
	Mean	42	63	37	65	58	54	60	46	35	42	34
3	1	27	50	36	100	64	38	17	46	42	50	50
	2	44	64	23	60	54	55	42	82	42	12	42
	3	42	45	40	62	58	44	75	85	62	33	50
	4	58	38	71	45	33	47	50	45	27	27	36
	Mean	43	49	42	67	52	46	46	64	43	30	44
4	1	30	31	20	61	36	25	100	25	20	14	20
	2	50	88	11	50	40	67	60	31	21	20	36
	3	23	42	29	75	22	64	27	50	38	36	38
	4	9	67	40	62	27	54	56	43	45	50	45
	Mean	28	57	25	62	31	52	61	37	31	30	35
5	1	50	58	17	33	50	46	62	40	18	14	62
	2	42	8	8	50	31	36	55	7	46	0	44
	3	62	54	33	46	40	40	40	11	23	42	62
	4	45	45	33	55	33	67	64	33	36	50	36
	Mean	50	41	23	46	38	47	55	23	31	26	51
6	1	29	44	8	18	17	54	38	21	20	33	21
	2	30	38	9	62	33	36	31	40	44	20	20
	3	44	36	54	38	25	46	55	36	42	50	67
	4	47	46	9	36	33	45	46	38	33	50	47
	Mean	38	41	20	38	27	45	42	34	35	38	39

Enumeration behavioral data

Participants had to remember the number of the bars that were shown right before and answer accordingly, by pressing the corresponding button. The number of bars presented in the visual stimuli ranged from 1 to 8. For each level of numerosity, scores in every run are related to the trials referring to visual stimuli matching the specified numerosity. The chance level was 12.5%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the Enumeration task

Numerosity	Run	sub-01	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
All numerosities	1	72	67	49	58	69	69	58	69	65	34	54
	2	70	71	47	69	73	69	51	66	64	48	50
	Mean	71	69	48	64	71	69	54	68	64	41	52
1	1	100	77	93	89	100	93	100	86	100	82	75
	2	92	100	60	100	92	70	100	100	100	82	83
	Mean	96	88	76	94	96	82	100	93	100	82	79
2	1	100	93	83	80	100	73	92	85	90	80	88
	2	100	85	92	100	94	78	94	100	100	56	100
	Mean	100	89	88	90	97	76	93	92	95	68	94
3	1	100	78	100	69	83	100	69	92	87	25	77
	2	100	100	64	73	100	100	42	91	89	80	64
	Mean	100	89	82	71	92	100	56	92	88	52	70
4	1	100	87	33	47	62	90	0	92	89	18	40
	2	92	89	33	67	88	79	0	83	100	36	64
	Mean	96	88	33	57	75	84	0	88	94	27	52
5	1	17	27	18	23	58	64	45	36	0	18	14
	2	42	47	31	45	58	80	20	38	17	33	30
	Mean	30	37	24	34	58	72	32	37	8	26	22
6	1	18	31	8	29	54	18	60	45	44	0	11
	2	23	62	17	20	64	38	44	62	20	27	33
	Mean	20	46	12	24	59	28	52	54	32	14	22
7	1	50	58	13	80	71	55	55	50	69	12	36
	2	36	60	22	89	60	69	67	36	73	36	8
	Mean	43	59	18	84	66	62	61	43	71	24	22
8	1	67	78	50	71	30	44	38	50	36	50	73
	2	93	56	50	47	29	47	33	33	10	47	38
	Mean	80	67	50	59	30	46	36	42	23	48	56

Self behavioral data

During the trials of the encoding blocks, participants had to press a specific button depending on whether they believed or not the adjective on display described someone (i.e. self or other, respectively for self-reference encoding or other-reference encoding conditions). During the trials of the recognition block, participants had to answer in the same way, depending on whether they believed or not the adjective had been presented before. No. of trials refers to the number of trialsonly for the recognition phase in the specified run and, thus, not to the total number of trials in the run. Because run 3 was longer than the remainder ones, the number of trials for the recognition phase was therefore greater. The chance level was 50%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the Self task

Run	sub-01	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
0	100	91	47	91	91	94	87	86	81	87	90
1	90	84	50	84	91	90	88	90	72	73	84
2	94	87	81	90	90	86	81	84	76	80	83
3	2	90	88	79	93	98	82	82	76	81	94
Mean	72	89	67	86	92	92	85	86	77	81	88

MathLanguage behavioral data

Subjects were presented with a series of facts (geometrical, arithmetical, general knowledge, nonsense sentences, etc) and were asked to indicate whether the presented fact was true or false. Subjects were instructed to consider nonsense as false. Scores were calculated based on the number of correct responses. When there was no answer for a given trial, it was considered a wrong answer, and where the subject answered more than once per trial, the first answer was considered. Since this is “true or false” task, the chance level was 50%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the MathLanguage task

Run	sub-01	sub-04	sub-06	sub-07	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1a	92	95	88	78	83	88	84	84	59	75	81
2a	94	89	89	91	92	89	83	81	83	64	81
3a	92	91	91	86	92	92	89	88	63	53	91
4a	88	94	92	89	91	86	88	88	77	50	92
1b	92	97	88	89	89	91	88	92	73	63	89
2b	94	88	84	91	91	91	86	80	86	70	91
3b	91	95	92	89	92	94	75	83	84	81	88
Mean	92	93	89	88	90	90	85	85	75	65	88

SpatialNavigation behavioral data

Subjects were positioned in an given intersection on a virtual city and were asked to point in the direction of a key building by rotating their point of view on a 360 degrees panorama. Scores were narrowed down to whether the subject pointed to the correct cardinal direction, as if their error was within 45 absolute degrees of the correct direction, and the number of correct responses was counted. The chance level then was 25%. This was decided due to the the premise was just instructed to point to the location of the building, but there was no explicit precision requirement.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the SpatialNavigation task

Run	sub-04	sub-06	sub-07	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-15
1	42	50	42	64	50	58	58	50	82
2	92	50	33	33	41	67	42	58	100
3	92	75	50	58	50	50	33	42	100
4	100	83	42	75	58	55	50	50	92
5	100	100	75	75	58	58	42	33	100
6	100	83	67	67	58	42	50	58	92
7	100	100	58	75	58	58	58	50	92
8	100	100	83	82	73	58	58	75	92
Mean	91	80	56	66	56	56	49	52	94

EmoMem behavioral data

Subjects were asked to press a button when they though of a link or “story” between two images. The score is calculated as the amount of responses on a run, which if the subject was attentive, should be equal to the number of trials. The chance level is 50%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the EmoMem task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1	98	95	98	87	97	95	100	97	90	88	100
2	98	92	98	85	92	95	93	98	90	85	100
Mean	98	93	98	86	95	95	97	98	90	87	100

EmoReco behavioral data

Participants were instructed to press a specific button when the face corresponded to a man, and a different one when it did to a female. Their responses were collected and the score was calculated as the number of correct responses, with a chance level of 50%. Missed responses were considered incorrect.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the EmoReco task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1	93	88	77	87	83	93	89	42	60	58	79
2	88	90	80	91	73	93	91	42	80	72	75
Mean	91	89	79	89	78	93	90	42	70	65	77

StopNogo behavioral data

Participants were presented with color-coded arrows. If the arrow was green, they were instructed to press a button, and if it was red, they were instructed to not respond. The trick came when the arrow started out green but turned red after a few milliseconds, and the subject had to withhold their response. The score was calculated as the number of trials in which they succeeded in withholding their response.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the StopNogo task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1	35	33	38	35	35	50	35	48	38	68	38
2	53	38	35	35	33	48	38	60	33	38	35
Mean	44	36	37	35	34	49	37	54	36	53	37

Catell behavioral data

Subjects were presented with four images in a row, and were asked to identify the oddball by pressing the corresponding button. The score was calculated as the number of correct responses, with a chance level of 25%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the Catell task

Run	sub-01	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1	73	87	83	89	90	79	88	83	83	74	83	95
2	83	92	81	85	80	76	97	79	80	65	88	93
Mean	78	89	82	87	85	77	93	81	82	69	85	94

FingerTapping behavioral data

Subjects were asked to press a button with their right hand, either a specific finger or the one they chose themselves within a set of selected fingers. The score was calculated as the number of correct responses, meaning the number of times the subject pressed the correct button on specified trials plus the times they pressed a button within the selected fingers on chosen trials. The chance level was 25%.

Response accuracy (%) of behavioral for the FingerTapping task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1	99	67	77	80	95	98	95	79	98	93	93
2	93	95	90	76	99	96	95	96	98	70	80
Mean	96	81	84	78	97	97	95	88	98	82	87

VSTMC behavioral data

Participants had to indicate the direction of motion of a set of dots by pointing a probe in the corresponding direction. Subjects could make 360 degrees rotations of the probe, and a response would be considered correct of the final angle would be within 45 absolute degrees of the correct direction. The score was calculated as the number of correct responses.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the VSTMC task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1	52	74	65	57	70	74	83	61	30	43	83
2	57	65	48	78	74	96	74	65	70	43	78
3	61	83	70	78	87	83	78	78	43	70	87
4	70	78	61	78	100	96	70	70	65	65	91
Mean	60	75	61	73	83	87	76	68	52	55	85

RewProc behavioral data

Participants were tasked with choosing between two presented figures. Depending on their choice, they wold have higher or lower probability of increasing their virtual reward. The score was determined by the number of responses in a run, reflecting their level of attentiveness. The chance level is set at 50%

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the RewProc task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-14	sub-15
1	100	99	100	100	100	100	100	93	100
2	100	99	100	100	99	100	100	92	100
Mean	100	99	100	100	100	100	100	93	100

NARPS behavioral data

Subjects were instructed to either accept or reject a gamble, indicating high or low confidence by pressing the corresponding button. The score reflects the level of attention of the subject and was calculated as the number of responses made during a run, excluding any missed responses. The chance level is set at 50%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the NARPS task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-14	sub-15
1	100	97	100	100	100	100	100	77	100
2	100	97	100	100	100	90	100	61	94
3	100	89	100	100	100	72	100	65	100
4	100	88	97	97	100	97	100	84	100
Mean	100	93	99	99	100	90	100	72	99

FaceBody behavioral data

Subjects were instructed to press a button every time an image repeated as a mirrored image (a flipped 1-back task). The score was calculated based on the number of correct responses. Missed responses were counted as incorrect.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the FaceBody task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-14	sub-15
1	83	64	89	89	78	83	67	67	61
2	83	86	61	83	83	92	44	61	53
3	83	61	75	81	75	81	50	83	56
4	92	75	69	86	83	97	44	64	67
Mean	85	72	74	85	80	88	51	69	59

Scene behavioral data

Subjects had to judge whether Escher-like scenes were possible or impossible. Additionally, there were “dot” trials, where they had to indicate whether the dot appeared on the right or left side of the screen. The score was determined by the number of scenes they judged correctly, plus the number of dots correctly located. Missing responses were counted as incorrect, with a chance level of 50%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the Scene task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-14	sub-15
1	73	55	79	73	79	64	75	54	80
2	63	71	77	71	68	75	80	55	75
3	68	68	79	79	64	79	75	55	75
4	63	61	77	80	80	82	79	59	70
Mean	67	64	78	76	73	75	77	56	75

ItemRecognition behavioral data

Participants were tasked to memorize a target and then indicate whether a probe was the same as the target. The score was calculated as the number of correct decisions. Missed responses were marked as incorrect, and the chance level was 50%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the ItemRecognition task

Run	sub-01	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-07	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-13	sub-14	sub-15
1	71	79	74	72	76	80	74	76	78	61	55	76
2	73	79	70	67	78	78	79	81	78	70	56	72
Mean	72	79	72	70	77	79	77	79	78	65	56	74

VisualSearch behavioral data

In the VisualSearch task there were two trials. On the visual search trials, participants had to indicate whether the target was present or absent in an array of items. On the working memory trials, they had to indicate whether a probe was present in a previously shown set of items. The score was calculated as the sum of correct responses in both types of trials. Missing responses were marked as incorrect, and the chance level was 50%.

Response accuracy (%) of performance for the VisualSearch task

Run	sub-04	sub-05	sub-06	sub-08	sub-09	sub-11	sub-12	sub-14	sub-15
1	63	73	69	71	79	83	60	58	73
2	69	73	66	77	74	72	58	52	69
3	72	70	81	77	73	71	69	61	71
4	59	80	72	85	81	62	62	62	77
Mean	66	74	72	78	77	72	62	58	73